Re: [Boost-users] smaller / decoupled `filesystem' module?

tom fogal пишет:

This is a minor part of the application we're writing, so I can't really justify the size. Has anybody out there written a `decoupled' filesystem, with less dependencies on other boost libraries? Even a trimmed down version would probably suit or needs for quite some time.

As I understand you, your problem not a size of boost.filesystem or how many dependencies it has. The problem is that boost.filesystem can't be integrated into your build system with one simple action. Am I right?