Well thanks guys for everything. I guess I don't need boost at all in this case after all. On Jan 2, 2008 8:25 PM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
I can't really agree or disagree, as my information comes from an
"Robert Dailey" <rcdailey@gmail.com> writes: article I
read a long time ago. It stated that the portable way to assign NULL to a pointer is to first cast it to the type of the lvalue.
class foo {}; foo* myfoo = 0;
No, that's guaranteed to work. Either the article you read was wrong, or you misinterpreted it.
-Miles
-- "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." Mahatma Gandhi
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users