
4 Dec
2008
4 Dec
'08
4:27 p.m.
AMDG Hicham Mouline wrote:
AFAIU, deriving from boost::noncopyable disables _accidental_ object copying.
Is it possible to implement a clone() const member function of the object to _explicitly_ get a copy of the object?
Perhaps deriving boost::noncopyable makes it totally impossible to ever get a copy of an object without resorting to byte copy.
boost::noncopyable has a private copy constructor and copy assignment operator. This prevents the compiler from generating a copy constructor and assignment operator for derived classes. That's all noncopyable does. If you want a clone function, the easiest way is probably to implement a private copy constructor and have clone call it. In Christ, Steven Watanabe