8 May
2006
8 May
'06
12:38 p.m.
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
I think this is their intended purpose, but I don't like using them that way. It gets confusing and brevity isn't attained as you have to qualify things. Namespaces support a "let's just agree to disagree" approach that isn't a resolution, but is the best that can be done at times. Do you think this shmem functionality should be integrated with the std containers?
Some STL implementations are close to achieve Shmem compatibility and it's not difficult to achieve if they use allocator::pointer typedefs in their implementation instead of raw pointers.
Have you submitted a proposal to the library working group? Jeff