3 Aug
2010
3 Aug
'10
5:12 p.m.
AMDG Wolfram Brenig wrote:
----------------------- Now, my question is, if such nested construction of functors at the call site, which is suggested also in the 'Bind Summary' in Karlsson's book, will actually lead to code which has no relevant performance loss as compared to 'old-style' for-loops? <snip> bind(multiplies<double>(),bind(sin,_1),bind(sin,_1)), bind(multiplies<double>(),bind(cos,_1),bind(cos,_1))
These calls to sin and cos are through function pointers. In Christ, Steven Watanabe