Eric Niebler wrote:
Christoph Duelli wrote:
compiling
#include <boost/xpressive/regex_actions.hpp>
fails with gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux) (running SuSE LES9)
Any chance that might be fixed? Anything I can do about it?
This is a pretty old compiler, and I don't have easy access to it. I Yes, unfortunately we have machine with that old thing. Too bad... Always makes me happy when my code does not work on an older machine ;-) suppose if you posted the error messages I might be able to suss out a workaround. Thanks. I will do so once back at work.
However, as a first hint: I was able to compile my stuff after disabling (#if 0) the following -apparently not needed by me- parts in that header. Perhaps its an issue with BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE. /// as (a.k.a., lexical_cast) /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( 1 , as , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::as)(typename)) ) /// static_cast_ /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( 1 , static_cast_ , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::static_cast_)(typename)) ) /// dynamic_cast_ /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( 1 , dynamic_cast_ , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::dynamic_cast_)(typename)) ) /// const_cast_ /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( 1 , const_cast_ , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::const_cast_)(typename)) ) Perhaps there was a compile problem with these, too: /// Usage: construct\<Type\>(arg1, arg2) /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_VARARG_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( construct , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::construct)(typename)) ) /// Usage: throw_\<Exception\>(arg1, arg2) /// BOOST_PROTO_DEFINE_VARARG_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE( throw_ , boost::proto::default_domain , (boost::proto::tag::function) , ((op::throw_)(typename)) ) (Can't check right now as someone has shut that machine down. I will on Monday, though!) For some reason, my "optional" constructs did not compile either. (I temp. replaced these by "| *_s"...) As I said, I will investigate the matter more next Monday. Best regards, and have a nice weekend Christoph