On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Edward Diener
<eldiener@tropicsoft.com> wrote:
On 2/24/2013 5:27 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 24/02/13 04:56, Michael Powell wrote:
I don't know if that makes any sense to anyone. It's all very
conceptual, very abstract, at this stage of the game. I know, or have a
sense, exactly how I might do it in C#, .NET 4, and so on. A little less
so what's available in C++, much less boost, spirit, phoenix, fusion,
etc.
Boost is a collection of C++ libraries. Albeit there are libraries on
various subjects, what it covers is fairly little when compared to .NET,
and it isn't as consistent.
There's no opinion war I'm looking for here. Have had exposure to C++/CLI as well.
There are a couple of potential problems I am charged with solving to do with .NET CodeDom type issues, dynamic compilation, pluggable interfaces, that sort of thing, potentially addressing those issues. However, the decision was made outside my control to go with Linux / C++, so my response to that was, "let's utilize Boost for the model's engine where the dynamic (and other) stuff is concerned."
So my questions were too broad, I'll concede that. I am learning what's available, can/will ask more informed questions later.
I do not mean to start an opinion war but I think your reply above gives the OP the wrong idea about the strengths of Boost libraries, especially as he is new to Boost. And yes I have programmed in .Net ( both C# and C++/CLI ) pretty extensively.
I do appreciate the feedback in the meantime, from all interested folks.