5 Aug
2008
5 Aug
'08
11:35 a.m.
Hello, I noticed that if I declare an event as deferred in a "parent" state (unintentionally), and define the reaction in some "indirect" inner state, then this reaction has no chance to be called. Is this the correct behavior or a bug? Example (pseudo-code): struct Parent : simple_state<..., Inner1> { defer Ev1; //of course, this is unnecessary; but if this an error? if I leave this line, then when we come to Inner1_3, the Ev1 is *not* processed; if I remove this line, everything is ok! }; struct Inner1 { defer Ev1; transit<Ev1to2, Inner2> }; struct Inner1 { defer Ev1; transit<Ev2to3, Inner3> }; struct Inner1 { in_state_reaction<Ev1> }; Thank you.