11 Jul
2006
11 Jul
'06
9:34 a.m.
On Tue, July 11, 2006 01:26, Sebastian Redl wrote:
Ovanes Markarian wrote:
In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be lazy. I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.
In what way does Boost.Optional fail to meet your needs?
Sebastian Redl
Thanks for your reply. I will take a look at this class in a more detailed manner. I saw it already, but thought it is not what I need. After some inspection I start to realize, that it is indeed what I might need. Thanks again. With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian