Re: [Boost-users] [Lambda] Handling Bind/Lambda name clashes.

Robert Jones wrote:

...

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:

using boost::lambda::bind;

should be a better choice.

Hello Peter

Yes, that was my first thought too. But this code still has ambiguity issues.

Yes, you're right, it has. Since boost::function is in namespace boost, the compiler still finds boost::bind via argument-dependent lookup. I'm afraid that you'll have to qualify the ambiguous bind: namespace ll = boost::lambda; ll::bind( my_sum, ... );