Micha Bieber <onsager@gmx.net> writes:
Hallo pps,
Wednesday, April 6, 2005, 5:01:10 PM, you wrote: p> Probably you are not that experienced with c++, mayby c only?.. My p> experience is about 2 years in programming and ~1y in c++ and I had 0 p> problems installing and using boost on winxp & freebsd. At least if you p> that experienced you should know that there better versions of vc around p> for years and it's probably time to check them - with vc6 many boost p> libs don't compile (libs are ok, compiler can't handle them)
[...]
p> Anyway EVERYTHING is explained really well for starters, just read the p> manual
[...]
p> You should read docs and it's enough to overcome this problem...
I think, we talk about different things. I'm not to lazy to read the docs, I'm also able to fiddle out the things in the end. It was in no my intention to boast about my experience. I'm using all the other compilers too etc., etc. The newest one isn't always the best for me. VC6 is sufficient for many things. I'm not in need to use partial template specialization for every project. What I'm talking about, is the picture for someone completely new to the library and the first impression he has. And here I miss some things. RTFM is not the answer to all things, if I can make my manual better. A library is for use. I'm completely aware of the fact, that boost isn't finished. Laying all the development issues aside, there is also the smootheness when dealing with other aspects e.g. installation.
You should first know that we recognize that installation is still harder than it should be, and we're working on solutions. You should also know that vc6 support is, for most purposes, being dropped from Boost.Graph. You should also know that no build step is required for Boost.Graph, as prominently described in http://www.boost.org/libs/graph/doc/index.html under "How to Build the BGL." HTH, -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com