Re: [Boost-users] [multi_index] SIGABRT in multi_index_container constructor

Manuel Jung wrote:

Am 26.02.2007, 23:32 Uhr, schrieb Joaquin M Lopez Munoz :

...

Manuel Jung writes:

...

Hi,

Sorry for hte delay, but i was in a train again yesterday, with no internet... But here im back now.

...

I don't really know :) I'm trying to gain more info on the context where the core happens. Let's begin with say the header and then we will pull from this thread if necessary, OK?

you got two files with this message. These are the slots.h and octopus.h. They are the only ones with multi_index_container definitions. Tell me what you need else. The files are just how they are, nothing is stripped out.

Hello, thanks for the files. There's a detail that smells funny: octopus.h begins with

#if !defined(NDEBUG) #define BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_INVARIANT_CHECKING #define BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_SAFE_MODE #endif

(which is commented out in the version you've sent, but I guess it is when in effect that the crash happens, right?) Yeah, sure. Just commented out, so i can do my work, without minding my little problem.

...

whereas slot.h does not have these macros, unless they're defined in diver.h or in myconnection.h. No, they dont have them.

...

Could it be that Boost.MultiIndex headers are included by diver.h or myconnection.h or slot.cpp (assuming this is the name where queue::AddQuery etc. are define) *without* defining safe mode and invariant checking macros? Yeah, this is true. The headers where defined in the diver.h, because i was trying and moving code a little bit around at the beginning of using Boost.MultiIndex. I have now fixed it. I dont get an error yet, but a i cannot run a full test, because some of the functions are broken at the moment. Ill fix that this evening and than well see whats up.

...

If so, you've got a problem: these macros have to be defined/undefined *globally*. i.e. you cannot compile one .cpp with them turned on and other without them: object incompatibility ensues.

Is this in the documentation and i didn realize? Maybe it should be said explicit, if its not in there.

...

Looking forward to your feedback,

Some more results in about 12 hours.

Hi, Took somewhat more time than 12 hours, but now im back here and the work is done. And my problem is fixed now. So the problem was that i defined tine INVARIANT and SAFE_MODE scripts not for every Boost.Multi_Index. Ill hope nobody will ran in this again :-o. Thanks very much to you Joaquín. You helped very fast and friendly. Even thanks for your great library. Maybe ill have some question again sometime. Not a very easy to use library at first, because its so nice and is very flexible. But now i think i got the most things i need. Thank you! I would send you some flowers, if you were not that far away (i think?). Best wishes, Manuel Jung

Greetings Manuel Jung

...

Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

PS: I answer your other question at a separate thread.

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users