9 Dec
2010
9 Dec
'10
5:55 p.m.
On 09/12/2010 17:26, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
I'm sure the intention was good, but the result and/or release notes didn't produce a BIG ENOUGH warning.
(Or it is that one should *always* rebuild bjam in case?)
Well it didn't help that the bjam binary link right above the 1.45 release link on the website apparently doesn't build 1.45. KTC