16 Dec
2009
16 Dec
'09
6:54 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Robert Ramey
Perhaps the "mistake" is not having typedef create a truely new type. Or maybe a new keyword "strong_typedef".
Kinda like D's typedefs (~ your strong_typedef) v.s. its aliases (~ C/C++ typedef) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/type.html (search for typedef) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/comparison.html#StrongTypedefs