Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Pardon me for being dense, but I don't see what you are referring to on this page. In Table 10.11, the Lock concept doesn't have any model. AFAIK, you can only work with dynamically allocated locks as Dave outlined in another post. But OTOH, perhaps I'm just beeing blind when reading the page.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are trying to do.. In that table (10.11) it is true that Lock doesn't have a model, but it's refinements do have models. What prevents you from using say, the boost::mutex::scoped_lock model? (Which has the lock/unlock calls.) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org