25 Feb
2006
25 Feb
'06
3:24 p.m.
"Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
Maybe it could be changed to (something like)
Return type: integral_c< typeof(c1::value + c2::value) , ( c1::value + c2::value ) > c;
This would guarantee that is_same can be used on the result. Currently I cant assume that.
You seem to have a deep misunderstanding of the problem. is_same< int_<3>, integral_c<int,3> >::value is false. They are different types. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com