Re: [Boost-users] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7

----- Mensaje original ----- De: Daniel James Fecha: Domingo, Diciembre 16, 2007 10:56 am Asunto: Re: [Boost-users] [review] Review of Unordered library begins todayDecember 7 Para: boost-users@lists.boost.org

On 15/12/2007, Cromwell Enage wrote:

...

The implementation rationale is detailed enough; however, I am curious as to the purpose of BOOST_UNORDERED_LOCAL_CBEGIN.

To be honest, it's something I'd forgotten about. A while ago, the 'cbegin' and 'cend' members were added to all the standard containers in the draft standard for accessing 'const_iterator' regardless of whether the container is const or not. But they weren't added for the unordered containers' local iterators (the iterators for single buckets). If that macro is defined they are included in the implementation.

I think the best thing to do is include the methods as an extension and document and test them properly. I might add a macro to turn off extensions.

Joaquín asked about this on comp.std.c++ but didn't get any reply:

I think it's already safe to include them unconditionally: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2482.html#691 Best, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo