18 Jan
2010
18 Jan
'10
12:25 p.m.
On Jan 18, 5:10 am, "Bilokon, Paul "
Dear Jesse, All, Is it perhaps the case that Boost MultiArray wasn't designed (or optimised) for numerical calculations?
I think that multi_array is optimized as a numerical library for its feature set. It certainly in the spirit of blitz++, though it doesn't have stencils, tensor reductions, etc. My guess is that the lack of integration with ublas is the usual problem of libraries working in silos, and a (relative) lack of new ublas features in the last few years. Also, you might want to consider discussing this on the ublas mailing list as well. -Jesse