JaeWook Choi wrote:
Hello Peter,
Thank you so much. It seems both solutions are working well. BTW, Is there any links that explain the differences /or commons between boost::bind & boost::lambda::bind in their usage?
There is http://www.boost.org/doc/html/lambda/s08.html#id2713474 but it doesn't seem to address neither of the questions you raised in your previous post. It should be possible to deduce most of the differences between lambda::bind and boost::bind by reading the documentation of the two libraries. For example, & doesn't work with boost::bind because boost::bind is not a "lambda" library and doesn't support operators (except for a very limited subset: http://www.boost.org/libs/bind/bind.html#operators that is a recent addition.) Lambda, on the other hand, doesn't support the boost::bind macro BOOST_BIND_ENABLE_STDCALL, however if you read http://www.boost.org/libs/bind/bind.html#Q_win32_api you'll see that it suggests an alternative of using bind<R>(...), so it makes sense to try it with lambda::bind and see whether it works. :-) Ideally, lambda::bind would be a superset of boost::bind, but for various reasons this is not the case today; at some point we probably need to accept this sad fact and write a page that lists all differences between the two.