1 Dec
2006
1 Dec
'06
7:58 p.m.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Ovanes Markarian Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:23 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost::weak_ptr and boost::intrusive_ptr
Just a small question:
Isn't it so, that linked lists (double or single), can be spreaded in the memory, so that cache misses and page faults are subject to happen? I think deque is a better choice (which can be better optimized in terms of locality)...
[Nat] My suggestion was based on the (implied) intrusive_ptr constraint of no additional heap resources. But if we were to use a policy-based approach, a deque implementation could be one of the policies.