Hi, I've just started playing around with Boost.Parameter. I'm in the progress of wrapping a legacy C library and some of the structs used have plenty of members, most of which have reasonable defaults. I thought that the Parameter library would be a nice fit here, but ended up with a couple of questions: 1. How can I define constructor for a class taking named parameters, without using the double parentheses syntax? The following basic idea works, but is ugly: --- ... BOOST_PARAMETER_KEYWORD(tag, minVal) BOOST_PARAMETER_KEYWORD(tag, maxVal) struct Foo { template<typename ArgPack> Foo(ArgPack& args) { m_minVal = args[minVal|0]; m_maxVal = args[maxVal|100]; } ... }; void bar() { Foo foo(( minVal = 1, maxVal = 2)); // Note double parens } --- I've experimented some with defining a parameter::parameters specification and use (the undocumented) BOOST_PARAMETER_MEMFUN, but that obviously doesn't work (forwarding, return values and constructors don't mix). It should be possible (I think) to define a BOOST_PARAMETER_CTOR macro that generate the ctor overloads and forwards to a setter method instead of the other way around. I guess I could create a free or static member function that constructs an object, but that would either force me to create heap-based objects, or invoke potentially expensive copy ctors. 2. Is there a way of detecting whether an argument was passed using position or name? Or, even better, is there a way of restricting the arguments to only be passed by name using the parameters specification? 3. Not a question really, but having a default arity of 5 seems awfully low to me. I hit that limit on first usage, and as the named parameters are supposed to be used in the interface of my wrapping library, forcing users to define BOOST_PARAMETER_MAX_ARITY "globally" feels a bit like asking for someone coming up and asking me to decode some compile errors. [I'm using the latest cvs head of boost, in combination with VC 8.0] Regards, Johan Nilsson