23 Nov
2008
23 Nov
'08
8:16 p.m.
Joel Falcou wrote:
Eric Niebler a écrit :
Hmm, comeau online rejects this code, too. (Not too surprising, I think Intel uses the comeau front end.) It's possible this is a gcc bug, not an Intel bug. When I have some time, I'll dive into the standard and see what it says about this case.
I'll d/l ICC 11 as soon as possible and see how it fares. Even if it's a gcc bug, can't we enforce the Dummy technique as *the* way to define proto extension ?
Well, the Dummy parameter is usually not needed, but you're right in that it never hurts to put it in. I'll make sure the documentation covers this case. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing www.boostpro.com