24 Jan
2006
24 Jan
'06
5:16 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Hi Bill,
Bill Buklis wrote:
Is this a bug or am I expecting it to do something that it shouldn't? Does anyone know a workaround for this (at least temporarily)?
Compiler: VC 7.1 boost: 1.33.0
The cvs has been updated so reverse_iterators are now defined as usual in terms of boost::reverse_iterator< iter_type > Thanks for the report. -Thorsten