Re: [Boost-users] [proto] folding a proto tree in reverse

...

...

...

...

"Eric" == Eric Niebler writes:

Eric> Maurizio Vitale wrote: >> Sorry for the noise, please disregard the previous post. I was >> missing the state in the invocation of the fold. Which is ok, >> when you don't have a data (it gets default constructed, which >> would have been ok for me), but cannot possibly work with data. Eric> Good, I was just sitting down to write a response. So did you Eric> get it working with proto::reverse_fold_tree?. Using fusion Eric> algorithms with proto::flatten will surely lead to long Eric> compile times. proto::reverse_fold_tree worked just fine in the end. I'm not too concerned about compilation time at this point. Rather the assembly code generated when evaluating fixed-point arithmetic shouldn't be too far from what you'd write by hand. Maurizio