Re: [Boost-users] question on boost-compliant code conventions

I see no problems with a mixed style. For what it's worth, I use the following style: Typenames in CamelCase. Function names with underscore_notation. Variable names with camelCase, with the first variable lower-case. Private members prefixed (or postfixed, if you wish) with an _underscore. This manages to avoid most conflicts. And to me, it's very readable. -- Michiel Helvensteijn