On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:50 PM, niXman <i.nixman@gmail.com> wrote:

1) whether these libraries are suitable for use in real projects? have
anyone used them?

Boost.Log: YES it's used in my application (a multi-process, multi-threaded game) and works well so far.

Others did use Boost.Log in production with high praise.

Boost.Process: Yes but it depends what exactly you need as some feature are still being discussed/worked.

I use it to spawn processes, but that's really the basic feature. I think it still needs some changes,

as discussed in this mailing list, but I think it's current state is ok if you just want to spawn "simple" processes.

Currently I use networking for communication between processes, because I can't assume they are running in the same computer.

2) do I understand correctly that the boost.process library does not
have open CVS?

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you asking if it's in git? I think it's in SVN.

3) do I understand correctly that for the boost.log library I should
use bleeding-edge branch?

AFAIK the bleeding-edge and trunk have been merged recently, so use trunk (it's boost.log v2 indeed).

I hope there will be a mini-review soon so that we finally can have it available by default.

Joel Lamotte