26 Apr
2005
26 Apr
'05
7:49 p.m.
I dont understand the need for the "Proposed Boost logging library". A perfectly good and flexible logging library exists in the form of log4cxx, which is much more flexible than the proposal, has a ton of tools, appenders, is compatible with log4j/log4net etc etc (for those of us who live in multiple worlds). log4cxx is going through a almost complete rewrite, but is still eminently usable. see http://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/
First statement from docs: "Log4cxx is C++ port of Log4j." Which tells me enough to be skeptical about your statements. I did not see single Java -> C++ port that has even something to talk about. Gennadiy