14 Jun
2006
14 Jun
'06
5:16 p.m.
On 6/14/06, me22
Perhaps it's just being "better safe than sorry". It's possible that a problem was noticed on a compiler with faulty ADL or when someone did struct foo : boost::noncopyable { ... }; without thinking of the ADL implications.
Whats wrong with that struct foo : boost::noncopyable { ... }; ? I assume that public inheritance will be a problem, or am I missing here something? -- - Kobi