Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?

Yes, there are some using namespace boost statements, and some of them are before some includes... but why would that suddenly break when it was working before I upgraded? Is boost now defining its own intmax_t (and other such tings, like uint64_t) where it wasn't before?

No, nothing in that part of Boost has changed for some time I believe. Boost does define it's own intmax_t etc *in namespace boost*, if you import these into the global namespace then expect things to break, sorry but that's the way it's *always* been. My guess is it worked before because the Boost and std lib versions happened to be identical by chance. John.