John Femiani skrev:
John Femiani skrev:
using namespace boost::fusion; using namespace boost;
Please don't do this. If you really think it is too much to write boost::, use
namespace b = boost; namespace bf = boost::fusion;
-Thorsten
Too much? I'm not lazy, just confused. I thought fusion would allow me to treat both types of container uniformly, and if I have to use different names that just isn't true. Perhaps I misunderstood Fusion.
This has, in general, nothing to do with Fusion or Range. The problem is, with your two statements,
using namespace boost::fusion; using namespace boost;
pulls in a potentially huge number of functions and classes. Many of these functions are unconstrained templates, eg. boost::begin() is. So which begin() function are you referring to? The correct way to use boost.range is to call boost::begin(). -Thorsten