28 Mar
2007
28 Mar
'07
8:03 p.m.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Sohail Somani
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey
Try serializing your test to xml archive. That will make the details a lot more visible.
Thanks for your suggestion. It seems the class_id's are reversed and that tracking_level=0! Is that a clue? Wieeeeeerd!
[xml output for vc71 and gcc32 snipped] If I load from the archive in gcc32 using the xml string from vc71, it works. So it seems that for some odd reason, gcc is generating the wrong id's to begin with.