Re: [Boost-users] make member functions (in)accessible

AMDG Stefan Funck wrote:

so I may do:

A a; a.propA.get(); a.propA.set(0.5); a.propB.get();

but NOT:

a.propB.set(1);

because propB was defined with Writable=false. BUT, from within class A, I would like to do

propB.set(1);

because otherwise this property is useless. (How) can this be achieved (with boost)?

These two cases are indistinguishable. In Christ, Steven Watanabe