9 Apr
2014
9 Apr
'14
9:37 p.m.
On 20 January 2014 07:21, John Maddock
Yes, there are some using namespace boost statements, and some of them are
before some includes... but why would that suddenly break when it was working before I upgraded? Is boost now defining its own intmax_t (and other such tings, like uint64_t) where it wasn't before?
No, nothing in that part of Boost has changed for some time I believe.
It appears the underlying type of boost::uint64_t did change from unsigned long to unsigned long long with the latest Ubuntu release, while std::uint64_t is still an unsigned long. We found this to be the case with gcc 4.7 and Boost 1.51, anyway. Just an FYI, Nevin :-) -- Nevin ":-)" Liber mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com (847) 691-1404