Re: Most efficient way to convert a run of Perl substitutions til boost::regex?

John Maddock wrote:

Have you thought about combining these into one big regex:

Err... Yes, but I didn't know that the syntax you describe was available. Where is this documented? I can't find any references to this in the accompanying documentation wrt. regex syntax. As the code is machine-generated from the original Perl code, it's semi-trivial for me to generate the most efficient C++/regex code, so even outlandish syntax is OK by me ;) Anders