Christian Henning wrote:
Hi there, I think there are some problems with binding functions if the class has a const and a non-const version of the same member. Please consider the following code:
[snips] No, it's not a bug. When you get the address of a member function, there is relly no way in C++ to know which overload you want to get. You have to state it explicitly with a cast. The same thing happens with Boost.Bind, for example, try: point const p; double x = boost::bind( &point::prob, _1 )(p); and you'll get the exact same error. The Boost Bind docs has a good explanation on this. See "Binding an overloaded function" here: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/libs/bind/bind.html#Troubleshooting Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net