On 08-Apr-2021, at 1:08 AM, Anil Muthigi <anilmuthigi123@gmail.com> wrote:I said that I am not sure if boost::variant supports __int128 because I had difficulties in compiling this code :
#include <boost/variant.hpp> #include <string> #include <iostream> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& o, const __int128& x) { if (x == std::numeric_limits<__int128>::min()) return o << "-170141183460469231731687303715884105728"; if (x < 0) return o << "-" << -x; if (x < 10) return o << (char)(x + '0'); return o << x / 10 << (char)(x % 10 + '0'); } int main() { boost::variant<__int128, char, std::string> v; v = 56; v = 'Y'; __int128 d=12; std::cout <<d << '\n'; std::cout << v << '\n'; v = "Yashaswi raj"; std::cout << v << '\n'; }If u replace __int128 with int in the variant variable, it seems to work just fine...On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, 00:10 Edward Diener via Boost-users, <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:On 4/7/2021 2:15 PM, Anil Muthigi via Boost-users wrote:
> I dont think so...
If it is available why do you think variant would not support it ?
> I guess int128_t under boost/multiprecision/cpp_int is the only viable
> option.
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 11:39 pm David Frank via Boost-users,
> <boost-users@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost-users@lists.boost.org>> wrote:
>
> especially the gnu __int128?
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users