Re: [Boost-users] Possibly too newbie a question?

19 Mar 2010

      I am using 1.42.0--
The declaration of rbtree_best_fit in rbtree_best_fit.hpp at line 58 looks 
like:

template
class rbtree_best_fit

The VoidPointer parameter name is what is used throughout the class 
implementation.

The forward declarationy ou pointed out in interprocess_fwd.hpp at line 166 
looks like:

template
class rbtree_best_fit;

The VoidMutex there is weird.
The same thing occurs in 1.35.0 and 1.36.0 -- the only other version I 
happen to have.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gevorg Voskanyan" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Possibly too newbie a question?
...
...
Thanks I just stumbled on that earlier today. It confounds me that the 
parameter
is renamed from VoidPointer to VoidMutex   ???!!!
Eric Whitcombe wrote:
that is basically how
...
I missed it. I thought there was some inscurtable argument deduction 
going
on.
Eric,
Well, I don't see the parameter renaming you mentioned. In fact, the only 
place I see "VoidPointer" identifier used in interprocess_fwd.hpp is on 
line 394 in declaration of intrusive_ptr class template, which is 
unrelated...
This is from a very recent boost trunk.
Best Regards,
Gevorg
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users