21 May
2008
21 May
'08
10:18 p.m.
John Femiani wrote:
I've been happily using gil for a while, and it suits my needs well, but I think your assessment is correct in your case. It does not have not the best image io library (they consider io an optional extension actually), and it does not help with image display at all. It would be nice if there was a boost graphics library..., but I guess that is to tricky to get right.
Thanks. Yeah, nothing against GIL, I'm sure it does what it was designed for well.