Re: [Boost-users] [1.33.0][date_time] Weird warning

Ben Hutchings wrote:

Paul wrote:

...

/usr/local/include/boost-1_33/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp: In function 'time_duration boost::date_time::parse_undelimited_time_duration(const std::string&) [with time_duration = boost::posix_time::time_duration]': /usr/local/include/boost-1_33/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:58: warning: control may reach end of non-void function 'static typename frac_sec_type::int_type boost::date_time::time_resolution_traits::to_tick_count(v_type, v_type, v_type, typename frac_sec_type::int_type) [with frac_sec_type = boost::date_time::time_resolution_traits_adapted64_impl, boost::date_time::time_resolutions res = micro, typename frac_sec_type::int_type resolution_adjust = 1000000, short unsigned int frac_digits = 6u, v_type = int32_t]' being inlined

You seem to have the wrong version of the Boost source. That function is in time_parsing.hpp, not time_duration.hpp, in version 1.33. You could install the libboost-date-time-dev package from sid instead of compiling it yourself.

Ben.

i have to compile it myself as i need to define BOOST_SIGNALS_NAMESPACE=signalslib (for boost_signals), as I use it in conjunction with the QT library. So i compile the whole thing for myself. and I am a bit concerned about your "wrong version" comment. I've checked, This code and this warning came out of the latest 1.33 tar.bz2. I've confirmed it. I think the error message is confusing: - to_tick_count is inlined in time_duration.hpp (the error line) - its inlined in the constructor for time_duration - time_duration is constructed in time_parsing.hpp - to_tick_count is in yet another file. the error message only mentions the time_duration.hpp. weird, eh? Paul