10 Oct
2005
10 Oct
'05
9:22 a.m.
Geoffrey Romer writes:
On 10/5/05, Aleksey Gurtovoy
wrote: Geoffrey Romer writes:
Suppose I'm tying to build a nested lambda expression, like so (typename...::type omitted for simplicity):
lambda
>, _2> > ... - Does the _1 refer to the first argument of the inner lambda, or of the outer lambda? The outer one.
Is that also true if the inner lambda were a bind?
No, bind expressions are passed through 'lambda' untouched. From
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp?rev=1.5&view=markup:
MPL_TEST_CASE()
{
typedef bind2