8 Mar
2005
8 Mar
'05
10:37 p.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote in message news:019001c5242b$3e480c70$6501a8c0@pdimov2... | Thorsten Ottosen wrote: | > "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message | > news:usm35lvo0.fsf@boost-consulting.com... | >> I guess the ugly adl_ prefix | > | > do you now anything less ugly? It clearly states the purpose of the | > function. | | Both begin() and range_begin() are much less ugly. well, the first is a no-no due to recursion. the second still don't suggest its a customization point. | adl_ as a prefix doesn't | save you from colliding with another ADL customization point, if your | convention catches on. no, but is that relevant? -Thorsten