12 Jul
2006
12 Jul
'06
2:57 p.m.
Scott McMurray wrote
My apologies, I didn't know that. Certainly a very nice feature as it means that even without the virtual destructor both would be safe.
Promises to double-check the documentation before replying next time,
No worries. It wasn't exactly a highly advertised feature. Besides, the note implied that older versions of shared pointer didn't do that, so I just figured you learned about shared pointers before they added it. Andrew