30 Aug
2009
30 Aug
'09
4 p.m.
Maurizio Vitale wrote:
Sorry for the noise, please disregard the previous post. I was missing the state in the invocation of the fold. Which is ok, when you don't have a data (it gets default constructed, which would have been ok for me), but cannot possibly work with data.
Good, I was just sitting down to write a response. So did you get it working with proto::reverse_fold_tree?. Using fusion algorithms with proto::flatten will surely lead to long compile times. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com