Igor R ha scritto:
You know why there is a so big difference between Linux and Win32 implementations for boost::pool? (if this timing are says the truth)
Where do you see a big difference? From the 2 pictures that I can see, the measurement for "BoostPool" is ~7ms, and for "BoostObjectPool" is ~13 -- on both pictures. Do I miss something?
Never mind, it's my fault! I'm very sorry! I didn't seen that the two Y scale are different!! I've take a look to boost::pool, tell me if I understand well. I have to allocate contiguous memory to store a recorded audio samples. So, is legal to do something like this: //Allocate chunks of 65535 bytes boost::pool<> p(65535); //Allocate 100*65535 bytes of contiguous chunks void * pMem = p.ordered_malloc(100) Now, assumes that I have a function like: void MyMemoryObj::Write(long pData, long byte_to_write) { // In windows I write the data pointed to pData into the buffer with: RtlMoveMemory pMem, pData, byte_to_write } Is there a way to copy memory in boost? Thanks, Daniele.