It seems to me that eval_if doesn't use lazy evaluation either. The error
message quite obviously refers to an attempt of the compiler to evaluate the
expression on the 'false' branch, whereas the condition (is_arithmetic<int>)
is true to my best knowledge.
Thx,
Agoston
---------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <iostream>
#include
Look in the mpl documentation under eval_if
Robert Ramey
Agoston Bejo wrote:
Hi! I'm looking for some "lazy" version of boost::mpl::if_. I'm not very much into MPL, so I
don't really know either if such a function exists in boost or whether it can be easily
constructed. Platform: VC++7.1
Thx in advance, Agoston
This example shows you how it may cause problems that both "branches" of if_ get evaluated:
//------------------------------------------------------------ #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include
#include using namespace std; using namespace boost; using namespace mpl;
template<typename T> struct t_type { typedef typename if_< is_arithmetic<T>, T, typename T::value_type>::type // ERROR! type; };
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { cout << typeid(t_type<int>::type).name() << endl; // 'int' cout << typeid(t_type
::type).name() << endl; // 'double' return 0; } //------------------------------------------------------------ Error message:
error C2825: 'T::value_type': cannot form a qualified name see reference to class template instantiation 't_type<T>' being compiled with [ T=int ]