6 Apr
2011
6 Apr
'11
2:24 p.m.
AMDG On 04/06/2011 04:02 AM, Robert Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Eric Niebler
wrote: On 4/6/2011 5:12 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
You could very well make the case that, indeed, nothing but subnamespaces should be in boost.
I'm not making that case, exactly. I'm saying that boost::function should actually be defined in boost::function_adl_block and be imported into the boost namespace with a using declaration.
Forgiver my ignorance here, but if you do that which namespaces are then considered for ADL? boost, boost::function_adl_block or both?
ADL only considers the namespace that the type is originally defined in. Using declarations don't increase the set of associated namespaces. In Christ, Steven Watanabe