Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?

On 21 January 2014 16:31, Gavin Lambert wrote:

Or worse, std::shared_ptr vs. boost::shared_ptr (as AFAIK there is no way to interop these without copying the underlying object, which breaks the semantics).

Well, you *can*, but it's a bit of a hack... < http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12314967/cohabitation-of-boostshared-ptr-...

. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com (847) 691-1404