14 Nov
2005
14 Nov
'05
7:06 a.m.
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
You're absolutely right! Thank you for the report.
No problem at all!
In the same line I would like to add that a colleague of point pointed
out this morning that on
http://boost.org/libs/numeric/conversion/doc/converter.html#examples
the typedef is written as
typedef boost::numeric::converter