13 Nov
2005
13 Nov
'05
7:05 p.m.
Daryle Walker wrote:
3a. In fact, I made a shocking realization researching for this thread. The standard describes "bool" in section 3.9.1, paragraph 6. Unlike "wchar_t" (described in paragraph 5), the "bool" does not have to be a rip-off of another built-in integral type!
I would be shocked to discover that wchar_t does have to be a rip-off of another built in integral type. The only compiler I test on that doesn't have wchar_t as an intrinsic type is VC 6.0. Should we be altering jam toolset to besure tha wchar_t is a synonnym for something else? Robert Ramey