Re: [Boost-users] [1.35.0] Release Candidate 3 available

Stephen Nuchia wrote:

This is a showstopper for me right now, though I am by no means an expert at running bjam. On a Windows (server 2003) 64-bit platform with MSVC 9.0 I am trying to build the major permutations of the library in both 32- and 64-bit variants. I was able to find command lines that appear to do the job for the 32-bit, debug/release, shared/static combinations and for the static combinations in 64-bit mode.

I'm getting the following output when I try to build shared libraries for 64-bit, with "shared" or "static" or no specification for link and runtime-link

C:\code\Version9\boost>bjam --toolset=msvc msvc/architecture=x86/address-model=64/runtime-link=shared/link=shared .......

C:/code/Version9/boost/tools/build/v2/build\virtual-target.jam:996: in virtual-t arget.register-actual-name from module virtual-target error: Duplicate name of actual target: boost_date_time-vc90-mt-gd-1 _35.dll error: previous virtual target { common%common.copy-boost_date_time-vc90-mt-gd-1 _35.dll.SHARED_LIB { msvc%msvc.link.dll-boost_date_time-vc90-mt-gd-1_35.dll.SHAR ED_LIB { msvc%msvc.compile.c++-greg_month.obj.OBJ { gregorian/greg_month.cpp.CPP } } { msvc%msvc.compile.c++-greg_weekday.obj.OBJ { gregorian/greg_weekday.cpp.C PP } } { msvc%msvc.compile.c++-date_generators.obj.OBJ { gregorian/date_generato

Please use the following command line: bjam --toolset=msvc architecture=x86 address-model=64 runtime-link=shared link=shared The command line you've specified say: 1. Build with 'msvc' 2. Build also with 'msvc' using address-model=64, etc So, in essence you request two builds. The 64-bitness is presently not represented in library name, or library path. So, you request to create two variants, and place them in the files with the same name. Boost.Build detects this conflict and reports its. You might want to note that 'msvc' is shorthard for toolset=msvc, whereas --toolset=msvc is actually same as 'toolset=msvc'. It's unfortunate that --toolset option exists, and advertised in the getting started docs, but that's not a topic for today. Also note that it would be great if your configure your mail client not to wrap long lines into unreadability :-) - Volodya